12 Angry Men

12 wroth MenGrand canon University Introduction: In the movie 12 Angry Men an cardinal year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors confide that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, pull for one, who recalls that they owe the boy more than than five minutes in deciding if he lives or non. The piece of music who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the moderation of the jurors and is ridiculed by them. An old man afterward sees where he is spillage with his reasoning and when the next balloting is done, he also votes innocent. The jurors move on to discuss the case and total up some grave facts in favor of the teenager. Gradually, some other jurors sire to change their minds, and the ones that do not become outraged. This writing germinate out collapse this movie in damage of how this group worked in concert and the end making passage, which emerged by answering nine pick at out questions. What is the influence of pertinent background factors on each jurors decision making process?

juror 1 was a prepare and knew the true meaning of workings together and in an slap-up fashion. Juror 2 was a flocculent utter follower who could be swayed by the crowd. Juror 3 stood his ground with the guilty verdict until the end because of the tear race with his own son. The fact that Juror 4 wore eyeglasses made him view the womans testimony of perceive the boy stab his father as she was turning everyplace in bed. He knew people who mount eyeglasses do not wear them to bed. Juror 5 was minor unnatural and kept his cool and was unfastened to the others thoughts and opinions and lessons they taught him. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper