Population Control Essay Example for Free

Population Control EssayINTRODUCTIONThe figment of over macrocosm is wiz of the most pervasive myths in Western caller, so deeply ingrained in the culture that it deeply shapes the cultures world view. The myth is compelling because of its simplicity. More people equal fewer resources and more hunger, poverty, environmental degradation, and semipolitical instability. This equation helps explain away the troubling homophile suffering in that other world beyond the neat borders of affluence. By procreating, the poor create their own poverty. We argon absolved of responsibility and freed from complexity. The population trim down is complex. Hartmann (1995) asserts that to put it into proper perspective requires exploring many realms of human experience and addressing difficult philosophical and ethical questions. It entails making connections between fields of thought that have accommodate disconnected as the result of narrow schoolman specialization. It demands the sharpeni ng of critical facilities and clearing the mind of received orthodoxies. And above all, it involves transcending the alienation embodied in the very equipment casualty population bomb and population explosion. Such metaphors suggest destructive technological processes outside human control. But the population issue is about living people, not abstract statistics.PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH universe CONTROLThe myth of overpopulation is destructive because it prevents constructive thinking and action on reproductive issues. Instead of clarifying our understanding of these issues, it obfuscates our mass and limits-our ability to see the real bothers and find workable solutions. Worst of all, it breeds racism and turns womens bodies into a political battlefield. It is a philosophy based on fear, not understanding.Now this picture both the population predictions and the cordial predictions be challenged by those who argue especially against compulsory population controls. It is argue d that we do not have accurate figures demo the number of people now existing in the world, that we have no reliable way of foretell future population growth, that there is no acceptable standard prescribing optimum population size, and that although the pressures of population whitethorn contri excepte to some social ills, they are not the primary cause of them.Those who respond to the population problem in this way point the finger in other causal directions to account for environmental m aginger to our economic system, which encourages environmental destruction, to our technology which is responsible for high-polluting individualized transportation, and to our minimal emphasis on public or mass transit and so on. They also point to the fact that some nutrition experts give us assurance that food resources exist which would permit the feeding of the worlds population even if it doubled.ALLEVIATING SOCIAL ILLS THROUGH cosmos CONTROLThe point is, this argument continues, that a number of voluntary moves can be under receiven to mitigate any(prenominal) causal influences population growth has on our social ills. We can produce more food, redistribute people, bring home the bacon meaningful jobs for women outside the home, provide family planning programs, contraceptive information and service, early abortions, voluntary sterilization, and so on. Anything minuscule of government coercion. Anything short of violating or overriding what is taken to be a fundamental moral and original right the right to procreate and to have as many children as one wants.Gordon (2002) relates in her take for that population control measures would alleviate certain local pockets of poverty, as population spare was relative, not hardly to the means of subsistence, but also to the system of control over the means of subsistence. In the same light, population control has always been closely associated with economic, moral and feminist issues in the United States. Many had a lso become aware that development by itself was not a magical solution to rapid population growth.The thinking of social reform in early twentieth-century America was embedded in the larger understanding that scientific principles could and should be applied in an effort to alleviate social ills. The great social ills we face like a shot poverty, war, hunger, disease and ecological degradation are clearly rooted from the sheer effects of population excess to the global situation, which is why the direct solution to the problem, which is population control, is the first and most potent step to take towards lessening the evil impacts of said social ills to the global community.Although many critics claim that overpopulation has been the famous scapegoat for societys ills, the fact that population could be controlled to a manageable degree could and would facilitate a widely distributed ease in the social inequalities being experienced by the world over due to the scarcity of resour ces available to the privileged few who has the means and the power to be in charge of the distribution or even the consumption of such scant resources.The growth of population very rapid in the less-developed countries, but not negligible in most developed countries, either will continue to compound the quandary by increasing pressure on resources, on the environment, and on human institutions. Rapid expansion of old technologies and the hasty deployment of new ones, stimulated by the pressure of more people wanting more goods and services per person, will surely lead to some major mistakes actions whose environmental or social impacts erode well-being far more than their economic results enhance it.This gloomy prognosis, to which a growing number of scholars and other observers reluctantly subscribes, has motivated a host of proposals for organized evasive action population control, limitation of material consumption, redistribution of wealth, transitions to technologies that are environmentally and socially less disruptive than todays, and movement toward some kind of world government, among others. Implementation of such action would itself have some significant economic and social costs, and it would require an unprecedented international consensus and set of public will to succeed.Throughout its history, the emphasis and primary concern of the population control movement has been the eudaimonia of the family it has stressed the economic, educational, and health advantages of well-spaced, limited numbers of children. Population control cannot be achieved in a social or economic vacuum, of course. To formulate effective population control measures, much greater understanding is postulate about all peoples attitudes toward reproduction, and how these attitudes are affected by various living conditions, including some that seem intimately intolerable to people in developed countries. Even more, it is essential to know what influences and conditions will lead to changes in attitudes in favor of smaller families.OUTLINEINTRODUCTIONPROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH POPULATION CONTROLALLEVIATING SOCIAL ILLS THROUGH POPULATION CONTROLWORKS CITEDHartmann, B. (1995). Reproductive Rights and Wrongs The Global Politics of Population Control. Boston, Massachusetts South End Press.Gordon, L. (2002). The moralistic Property of Women The History of Birth Control Politics in America. Chicago, Illinois University of Illinois Press.