Essay --

The recognition of same- land up espousal is a political, companionable, and religious issue. Because of this same-sex pairing is a very controversial topic. Legal acknowledgement of same sex marriage is commonly referred to as marriage par. Many advocates of marriage equality argue that laws restricting marriage to only heterosexuals discriminate against transgenders. On the other(a) hand advocates against same-sex marriage argue that it would undo long-standing traditions and change the meaning of marriage in a damaging manor. In this essay I entrust be arguing for same-sex marriage. The arguments mentioned as well as others will be discusses throughout this paper.Firstly I will discuss the reasons for marriage equality. I argue marriage equality is in the best interest for family life. Allowing homosexuals to lick stable committed relationships through marriage would allow for healthier homosexual relationships. You cant prevent people from being homosexual stock- unruffl ed giving those people the right to marry can help them hear greater personal happiness. Studies have suggested that non only does legalizing marriage in an area generally make homosexual individuals in that area happier it to a fault makes them physically and mentally healthier and saves them money on health do by (Hatzenbuehler, OCleirigh, Grasso, Mayer, Safren, & Bradford, 20012). I dont see any obligate reason to take away the joy homosexuals get from marriage, this is one of the legion(predicate) reasons I support marriage equality. Marriage naturally creates families it provides the conditions for a goodish environment that is beneficial to the upbringing of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage often ground their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that sa... ...me-sex marriage. However marriage is not solely defined as a relationship between a man and a woman. The definition of marriage has varied throughout history. Depending firmly on religi ous and political views of an individual society. Quote and quote ever-changing the meaning of marriage would not damage the meaning a marriage. It would still be the same binding contract that it is today. In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.