Media and propaganda

The locomote at atomic number 20 invoke University, associated with wholeegedly low salaries of the staff has been covered by a deed of mass communication media. The present paper is intended to comp are the centers from distinguishable sources, analyze and find media biases and the elements of propaganda. As the preliminary results suggest, near binds are biased, and superstar of them emphatically urges Ameri crappers to support the body process.The first expression in the scope, written by C.Arjentera and published in the Monterey County Star places accents and emphases in quite an unusual way. For instance, the article first and fore some describes the beat The union has announced that a gain, which would be the first for our system, would be a series of 2-day rolling actions that would move from campus to campus old in April or May. Eventually affecting all 23 including CSU-Monterey bespeak (Arjentera, 2007, p. 5).Furthermore, the informant provides the critici sm and claims of the dissatisfied capacity member who states that union is presumable to decline after the introduction of the tradition of job actions. The paper withal includes the local officials, but presenting their views, the article implicitly claims that the administration is merely concern astir(predicate) the deterioration of education tint in the university, which might get on during the strike.The true cause of the strike is presented only at the end of the article capacity and administrators agree CSU instructors are paid less that peers at similar institutions in other states (Arjentera, 2007, p. 5). As iodine quarter under lose, the author have the appearance _or_ semblances to have a bun in the oven kept in mind the features of human perception (the leading dissever is most worryly to be memorized) and deliberately placed the negative messages concerning the strike and the perceived poor professionalism at the beginning, whereas the participants proble m are mentioned very presently in the concluding chapter.On the contrary, the article at NBC.com is frequently more achromatic and returns neither positive not negative propaganda. Its structure can be outlined in the following way 1) a brief, but worldwide idea about the strike 2) the real extent of the problem (figures) 3) quotations of mental module members averments 4) administrations view on the problem and the statement of the indispensableness for compromise. The article seems to cover different views on the job action from positively enthusiastic to extremely cautious, most importantly, there are real people, who stand beyond these messages We dont understand why they feel they cant make some kind of reasonable offer to us. Canton says Well what about students? How do we make them competitive?How do we make sure the faculty (is) competitive? Its not unless about administrators, said San Francisco Sen.Leland Yee (http//www.nbc11.com/news, 2007). This means, the off icials are in reality aware of the treble sides of the situation and pay attention not merely to the strikers manifested needs, defended through a arcdegree of pressure, but also at the possible positive outcomes, or else than putting forth the claims like If we dont reach consensus, the quality of education go out fall, implied in the previous paper.The official CSU internet site describes the event not merely as a PR-action, but as a pompous event John Travis, the president of the California Faculty Association, called it a truly historic day (Gavios, 2007). As one can understand, due to the fact that the web-page belongs to the university, it is supposed to highlight the subjective importance of the action for the staff, rather than in broader social context. Thus, the article describes the extent of the strike and its features for instance, the author notes that the job action is not a traditional strike, as it doesnt infringe upon the students interests and implies almost no withdrawal from work, merely walkouts and picketing.The implicit message in this focus is understandable the author tries to show how the strikers care about their learners and how successfully they combine their labor with the protest. Furthermore, the paper contains no opinions of state officials and administration, constraining the focus to few union members and the possibility of the introduction of additional efforts, if the strike at this stage is fruitless. Although this article contains certain biases like shifting accents, it cannot be classified as propaganda, as it simply resembles a position statement and the extent of support the strikers have received.The final paper I would like to analyze is the article by Leland Yee, which contains the elements of explicit propaganda and is performed in extremely delirious tone, which infer the senators deep sympathy for the underpaid laborers It is no wonder the faculty at our state universities are voting in overwhelming to tal to go on strike. I, like many other legislators, students and taxpayers, share the facultys frustration (Yee, 2007).The official completely consents to the participants demands, moreover restates them different multiplication and argues that even the support from higher education network, which has doubled the teachers salaries over the two last years, nevertheless doesnt fill the income gap, when comparing professors from CSU and other universities. The sanctioned message the article underlies is Well-educated and professional staff should not be discriminated and discredited with low salaries. The author finally encourages his audience to join the strike Please join us in bringing much undeniable transparency, accountability and public access to our institutions of higher education by musical accompaniment SB 190 (Yee, 2007)As one can understand from this analysis, only one article contains no biases, which is the paper on NBC.com, whose author seems impartial, consistent a nd logical, as the article is structured very soundly the first paragraph answers all vital questions like When?, Why?, Where?, Who else is involved? (whereas Arjenteras and Yees papers omit some of these questions in the first paragraph) in addition, the paper contains the fragments of opinions and standpoints, which are different in nature and tone. Arjenteras article contains too much words like reject or refuse as wellhead as negative statements, pointing to the deficiencies rather than to goals and the possible steps towards compromise.Moreover, it is written in quite pessimistic spirit Union leaders dispute that most teachers would actually receive that much and disagree over a moral excellence pay proposal (the concluding paragraph) (Arjentera, 2007, p.5). Thus, the author implies that the action is to certain degree pointless. Yees and Gaviouss papers are explicitly optimistic, and both seem to take the strikers side.Although the latter paper is situated on CSU site, it doesnt contain any radical positions, but it can be declared as biased nonetheless, as the author doesnt include the true tinge of the strike on students and California state budget, yet he notes that the teachers will not miss many lessons. Yees paper contains explicit propaganda and the promotions of the strikers interests. collect to the fact that the author is the influential political figure, his request to support the participants is extremely strong in terms of its power over public consciousness.In conclusion, I would like to post my recommendations for citizens, who wish to learn more about the events. NBC.com has appeared the most reliable and credible source, but I wouldnt like to give notice (of) or promote it in fact, to launch critical thinking, it would be tolerable to read or listen to the news from three-four different sources and think cautiously not merely on the strike itself, but also get its financial side and outcomes for the state budget as well as the possible improvement of education quality at the university.Reference listArjentera, C. (22 March 2007). CSU faculty authorize a strike. Teachers still negotiating with college system. Monterey County Herald, p.5.NBC news. (21 March 2007). Votes Are In CSU collide with Looms. Available online at http//www.nbcbayarea.com/news/Gavios, J. (22 March 2007). Faculty Union for California State U. Authorizes Rolling Walkouts if Contract Negotiations Fall. Chronicles of Higher Education. Available online at https//www2.calstate.edu/mediacenter/